Abstract
Objective. Motion analysis of surgical instruments can be used to evaluate laparoscopic surgical skills, and this study assessed the validity of an optical tracking system for the assessment of laparoscopic surgical motor skills. Methods. Ten experienced surgeons and ten novices were recruited to complete the transferring tasks on a laparoscopic simulator. An optical tracking system, Micron Tracker, was used to capture the marker points on each instrument and to obtain the coordinates of the marker points and the corresponding instrument tip coordinates. The data are processed to create a coordinate system based on the laparoscopic simulator and to calculate the movement parameters of the instruments, such as operating time, path length, speed, acceleration, and smoothness. At the same time, the range of motion of the instrument (insertion depth and pivoting angle) is also calculated. Results. The position that the tip of the instrument can reach is a small, irregularly shaped spatial area. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between the surgeon and novice groups in parameters such as operating time, path length, mean speed, mean acceleration, and mean smoothness. The range of insertion depth of the instruments was approximately 150 mm to 240 mm, and the pivoting angles of the left and right instruments were 30.9° and 46.6° up and down and 28.0° and 35.0° left and right, respectively. Conclusions. The optical tracking system was effective in subjectively evaluating laparoscopic surgical skills, with significant differences between the surgeon and novice groups in terms of movement parameters, but not in terms of range of motion.
1. Introduction
Laparoscopic surgery is the quintessential example of minimally invasive surgery [1, 2], which is routinely performed through multiple (3-5) tiny (5-12 mm) incisions and has a wide range of clinical applications. Due to the use of rigid slender instruments, the lack of tactile feedback, the fulcrum effect, and the lack of a sense of depth, surgeons require a higher level of skill in laparoscopic manipulation compared to conventional open surgery. One of the objective indicators for evaluating surgical skills is the movement parameters of the instruments [3–6], and when the operator is skilled at a particular task, he/she will demonstrate more effective instrument movements, as reflected in the movement parameters of the instruments.
The measurement of motion parameters of instruments has been achieved by various methods [7–10], such as electromagnetic positioning, mechanical means, and optical tracking. The motion parameters evaluated are usually the path length, speed, acceleration, smoothness of the instrument, etc. These parameters are either path accumulations of the instrument position or derivatives of the different values for the operation time [11–13]. The optical tracking system has many advantages over electromagnetic positioning and mechanical methods. Firstly, it is a noncontact measurement method that does not require much modification to the measurement target, does not require the use of cables to transfer data, and does not require a marker to be placed on the measured target. Secondly, the use of electromagnetic equipment is inevitable in the actual surgical environment, and this inevitably interferes with the electromagnetic positioning system [14–16], whereas the optical capture system is not affected. The disadvantage is that there must not be an obstacle between the marker point to be measured and the optical tracking system to block the propagation of light, which can be solved by the proper design and installation of the marker point.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of an optical tracking system, the Micron Tracker, for the assessment of motor skills in laparoscopic surgery. Innovatively, the data from two different operating levels (surgeon and novice groups) were tested using the optical tracking system to record the position of the instruments during the operation. The coordinates of key points on the laparoscopic simulator were obtained and used to create a coordinate system from which the motion parameters of the instruments, such as time, path length, speed of movement, acceleration, and smoothness, as well as the range of motion of the instruments (insertion depth and pivoting angle), were calculated. The differences between the surgeon group and the novice group are analyzed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Platform
The experimental platform consists of a simulator and an optical tracking system (Figure 1(a)): (1) The simulator is a product of Shanghai Shide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. A built-in camera is used to transmit the image from inside the simulator to the monitor. (2) The optical tracking system uses a third-generation Micron Tracker from Claron Technology Inc. of Canada, camera model H3-60, which captures the 3D coordinates of marker points within its field of view in real time. It is widely used for skills assessment, visual navigation, etc. [13, 17–19]. In this study, two types of markers were designed and fixed to the proximal end of the instrument (Figure 1(b)), which are lightweight and robust enough not to interfere with the normal use of the instrument. The Micron Tracker captures the location of the marker and obtains the position of the instrument tip by calibration. Two 5 mm standard length gripping forceps (Shanghai Shide Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai) were used for this study.


2.2. Task Setting
This study set out to test the “left-right ring transfer” training task, which focuses on the operator’s hand-eye coordination and two-handedness [20]. The task requires the trainer to use the left hand to grab the rubber ring from the left post, pass it to the right hand and attach it to the right post. After the 4 rubber rings have been placed on the right post one by one, the process is reversed, with the right hand grabbing the rubber ring and passing it to the left hand and placing it on the left post, in turn, to complete the training. The training task is shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Operators
Ten surgeons and ten school students who are right-handed, without any hand disabilities and with a corrected vision of at least 1.0 are recruited as operators for the task. The purpose and content of the training task and the specific task steps are explained to the volunteers before operating. All operators were given 10 minutes to familiarize themselves with the task content. Each operator completed the task three times in succession, and the average of the calculated results was taken as the data for that operator.
2.4. Measurement Process
After commissioning the experimental equipment and waiting for the Micron Tracker camera to warm up and stabilize, the measurements are started. The type of marker and the corresponding instrument tip point are registered in the optical tracking system. Each operator repeatedly completes the task three times. Data are recorded including time, the position of the instrument marker point, and the position of the instrument tip. Once the task is completed, the trocar is removed, and the coordinates of the two insertion points are measured using the test tool that comes with the optical tracking system, and the coordinates of the center point of the task board are measured using the surgical instruments. Data processing and analysis are carried out after the completion of all tests.