architecture

光学追踪系统在腹腔镜手术运动技能评估中的应用


目的。对手术器械进行运动分析可用于评估腹腔镜手术技能;本研究旨在评估一种光学追踪系统在评估腹腔镜手术运动技能方面的有效性。方法。本研究招募了10名经验丰富的外科医生和10名初学者,要求他们在腹腔镜模拟器上完成器械转移任务。研究采用“Micron Tracker”光学追踪系统来捕捉每件器械上的标记点,并获取这些标记点的坐标以及相应的器械尖端坐标。随后对数据进行处理,建立基于腹腔镜模拟器的坐标系,并计算器械的运动参数,包括操作时间、运动轨迹长度、速度、加速度及平滑度。与此同时,还计算了器械的运动范围(包括插入深度和枢轴转动角度)。结果。器械尖端所能触及的位置构成了一个狭小且形状不规则的空间区域。在操作时间、运动轨迹长度、平均速度、平均加速度及平均平滑度等参数上,外科医生组与初学者组之间呈现出显著差异(p < 0.05)。器械的插入深度范围约为150 mm至240 mm;左右两侧器械的枢轴转动角度分别为:上下方向30.9°和46.6°,左右方向28.0°和35.0°。结论。该光学追踪系统能够有效地对腹腔镜手术技能进行客观评估;在运动参数方面,外科医生组与初学者组之间存在显著差异,但在运动范围方面则无显著差异。


1. 引言

腹腔镜手术是微创外科领域的典型代表 [1, 2]。该类手术通常通过多个(3至5个)微小(5至12 mm)切口进行操作,且临床应用范围广泛。鉴于腹腔镜手术需使用刚性细长器械,且存在触觉反馈缺失、支点效应以及深度感知不足等局限性,相比于传统开放式手术,外科医生在进行腹腔镜操作时需要具备更高水平的技能。评估手术技能的客观指标之一是手术器械的运动参数 [3–6];当操作者对某项特定任务驾轻就熟时,其器械动作将呈现出更高的效率,这一点会直观地体现在器械的各项运动参数之中。


目前,器械运动参数的测量已可通过多种方法实现 [7–10],例如电磁定位、机械测量以及光学追踪等。通常被纳入评估的运动参数包括器械的运动轨迹长度、速度、加速度以及动作平滑度等。这些参数要么是器械位置随时间累积形成的轨迹量,要么是器械位置随操作时间变化的各阶导数值 [11–13]。相较于电磁定位和机械测量方法,光学追踪系统具有诸多优势。首先,它属于一种非接触式测量方法,既无需对被测对象进行大幅改造,也无需借助线缆传输数据,更无需在被测对象上额外粘贴标记点。其次,在实际的手术环境中,电磁设备的运用往往不可避免,而这势必会对电磁定位系统产生干扰 [14–16];相比之下,光学捕捉系统则完全不受此类干扰的影响。当然,该系统也存在一定的局限性:即被测标记点与光学追踪系统之间绝不能有任何障碍物阻挡光线的传播;不过,这一问题完全可以通过对标记点进行合理的布局与安装设计来加以解决。


本研究的主要目的在于评估一款名为“Micron Tracker”的光学追踪系统,在腹腔镜手术运动技能评估方面的有效性。本研究的一项创新之处在于:利用该光学追踪系统对两个不同操作水平群体(即资深外科医生组与初学者组)的数据进行了对比测试,并在手术操作过程中实时记录了器械的位置信息。研究人员首先获取了腹腔镜模拟器上关键点的坐标数据,并以此为基础建立了一套坐标系;随后,基于该坐标系计算出了器械的各项运动参数——包括操作耗时、轨迹长度、运动速度、加速度、动作平滑度,以及器械的运动范围(即插入深度与枢轴转角)。最后,研究人员对资深外科医生组与初学者组之间在上述各项指标上的差异进行了深入分析。

2. 材料与方法

2.1. 实验平台

该实验平台由一台模拟器和一个光学追踪系统组成(图1(a)):(1) 模拟器由上海视德医疗科技有限公司生产,其内置摄像头用于将模拟器内部的图像传输至监视器。(2) 光学追踪系统采用加拿大 Claron Technology Inc. 生产的第三代 Micron Tracker(摄像头型号:H3-60),该系统能够实时捕捉其视场范围内的标记点三维坐标。该系统被广泛应用于技能评估、视觉导航等领域 [13, 17–19]。在本研究中,我们设计了两种类型的标记,并将其固定在器械的近端(图1(b));这些标记重量轻且结构稳固,不会干扰器械的正常使用。Micron Tracker 负责捕捉标记的位置信息,并通过校准计算出器械尖端的位置。本研究选用了两把标准长度为 5 mm 的抓钳(上海视德医疗科技有限公司,上海)。


Application of an Optical Tracking System for Motor Skill Assessment in Laparoscopic Surgery

First published: 22 July 2022
  
Academic Editor: Ahmed Faeq Hussein
This article is part of Special Issue: 

Abstract

Objective. Motion analysis of surgical instruments can be used to evaluate laparoscopic surgical skills, and this study assessed the validity of an optical tracking system for the assessment of laparoscopic surgical motor skills. Methods. Ten experienced surgeons and ten novices were recruited to complete the transferring tasks on a laparoscopic simulator. An optical tracking system, Micron Tracker, was used to capture the marker points on each instrument and to obtain the coordinates of the marker points and the corresponding instrument tip coordinates. The data are processed to create a coordinate system based on the laparoscopic simulator and to calculate the movement parameters of the instruments, such as operating time, path length, speed, acceleration, and smoothness. At the same time, the range of motion of the instrument (insertion depth and pivoting angle) is also calculated. Results. The position that the tip of the instrument can reach is a small, irregularly shaped spatial area. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between the surgeon and novice groups in parameters such as operating time, path length, mean speed, mean acceleration, and mean smoothness. The range of insertion depth of the instruments was approximately 150 mm to 240 mm, and the pivoting angles of the left and right instruments were 30.9° and 46.6° up and down and 28.0° and 35.0° left and right, respectively. Conclusions. The optical tracking system was effective in subjectively evaluating laparoscopic surgical skills, with significant differences between the surgeon and novice groups in terms of movement parameters, but not in terms of range of motion.

1. Introduction

Laparoscopic surgery is the quintessential example of minimally invasive surgery [12], which is routinely performed through multiple (3-5) tiny (5-12 mm) incisions and has a wide range of clinical applications. Due to the use of rigid slender instruments, the lack of tactile feedback, the fulcrum effect, and the lack of a sense of depth, surgeons require a higher level of skill in laparoscopic manipulation compared to conventional open surgery. One of the objective indicators for evaluating surgical skills is the movement parameters of the instruments [36], and when the operator is skilled at a particular task, he/she will demonstrate more effective instrument movements, as reflected in the movement parameters of the instruments.

The measurement of motion parameters of instruments has been achieved by various methods [710], such as electromagnetic positioning, mechanical means, and optical tracking. The motion parameters evaluated are usually the path length, speed, acceleration, smoothness of the instrument, etc. These parameters are either path accumulations of the instrument position or derivatives of the different values for the operation time [1113]. The optical tracking system has many advantages over electromagnetic positioning and mechanical methods. Firstly, it is a noncontact measurement method that does not require much modification to the measurement target, does not require the use of cables to transfer data, and does not require a marker to be placed on the measured target. Secondly, the use of electromagnetic equipment is inevitable in the actual surgical environment, and this inevitably interferes with the electromagnetic positioning system [1416], whereas the optical capture system is not affected. The disadvantage is that there must not be an obstacle between the marker point to be measured and the optical tracking system to block the propagation of light, which can be solved by the proper design and installation of the marker point.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of an optical tracking system, the Micron Tracker, for the assessment of motor skills in laparoscopic surgery. Innovatively, the data from two different operating levels (surgeon and novice groups) were tested using the optical tracking system to record the position of the instruments during the operation. The coordinates of key points on the laparoscopic simulator were obtained and used to create a coordinate system from which the motion parameters of the instruments, such as time, path length, speed of movement, acceleration, and smoothness, as well as the range of motion of the instruments (insertion depth and pivoting angle), were calculated. The differences between the surgeon group and the novice group are analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Platform

The experimental platform consists of a simulator and an optical tracking system (Figure 1(a)): (1) The simulator is a product of Shanghai Shide Medical Technology Co., Ltd. A built-in camera is used to transmit the image from inside the simulator to the monitor. (2) The optical tracking system uses a third-generation Micron Tracker from Claron Technology Inc. of Canada, camera model H3-60, which captures the 3D coordinates of marker points within its field of view in real time. It is widely used for skills assessment, visual navigation, etc. [131719]. In this study, two types of markers were designed and fixed to the proximal end of the instrument (Figure 1(b)), which are lightweight and robust enough not to interfere with the normal use of the instrument. The Micron Tracker captures the location of the marker and obtains the position of the instrument tip by calibration. Two 5 mm standard length gripping forceps (Shanghai Shide Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai) were used for this study.

Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image

2.2. Task Setting

This study set out to test the “left-right ring transfer” training task, which focuses on the operator’s hand-eye coordination and two-handedness [20]. The task requires the trainer to use the left hand to grab the rubber ring from the left post, pass it to the right hand and attach it to the right post. After the 4 rubber rings have been placed on the right post one by one, the process is reversed, with the right hand grabbing the rubber ring and passing it to the left hand and placing it on the left post, in turn, to complete the training. The training task is shown in Figure 2.

Details are in the caption following the image

2.3. Operators

Ten surgeons and ten school students who are right-handed, without any hand disabilities and with a corrected vision of at least 1.0 are recruited as operators for the task. The purpose and content of the training task and the specific task steps are explained to the volunteers before operating. All operators were given 10 minutes to familiarize themselves with the task content. Each operator completed the task three times in succession, and the average of the calculated results was taken as the data for that operator.

2.4. Measurement Process

After commissioning the experimental equipment and waiting for the Micron Tracker camera to warm up and stabilize, the measurements are started. The type of marker and the corresponding instrument tip point are registered in the optical tracking system. Each operator repeatedly completes the task three times. Data are recorded including time, the position of the instrument marker point, and the position of the instrument tip. Once the task is completed, the trocar is removed, and the coordinates of the two insertion points are measured using the test tool that comes with the optical tracking system, and the coordinates of the center point of the task board are measured using the surgical instruments. Data processing and analysis are carried out after the completion of all tests.