architecture

手术导航自动配准算法的初步研究

在外科手术中使用手术导航系统之前,通常需要进行注册(配准)操作;这一传统流程既耗时又依赖人工,不仅容易产生人为误差,且在手术过程中往往需要根据需要反复执行。当引入术中三维成像技术(例如C型臂锥形束CT,即CBCT)时,这一传统流程将变得更加耗时,因为每获取一组更新的三维体数据,都需要重新进行一次注册。为了提高图像引导手术中图像坐标系与现实世界参考系之间注册的速度与精度,本研究开发并验证了一种新型的自动注册算法。该手术导航系统由以下组件构成:一台或多台追踪相机(选用 Northern Digital Inc. 公司的 Polaris 或 Claron Technology Inc. 公司的 MicronTracker)、一套定制软件(Cogito,运行于个人计算机上),以及一套基于移动式等中心C型臂(Siemens 公司出品)的CBCT成像系统原型。研究人员开展了一系列实验,旨在测试该自动注册方法在配合 MicronTracker 和 Polaris 这两款追踪相机使用时的注册精度。实验结果表明,无论配合 Claron 还是 Polaris 相机使用,该自动注册方法的性能均可媲美传统的手动注册流程。在手动注册流程中,针对 Polaris 和 MicronTracker 相机,所观测到的目标注册误差(TRE)的平均均方根(RMS)值分别为 2.58 ± 0.42 mm 和 1.76 ± 0.49 mm;而在采用自动注册算法时,针对 Polaris 和 MicronTracker 相机,所观测到的平均 TRE 值分别为 2.11 ± 0.13 mm 和 2.03 ± 0.3 mm。目前,针对将该自动注册技术应用于C型臂CBCT引导下的外科手术流程,相关的实施与优化工作正在积极推进之中。


Initial investigation of an automatic registration algorithm for surgical navigation


Abstract:

The procedure required for registering a surgical navigation system prior to use in a surgical procedure is conventionally a time-consuming manual process that is prone to human errors and must be repeated as necessary through the course of a procedure. The conventional procedure becomes even more time consuming when intra-operative 3D imaging such as the C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) is introduced, as each updated volume set requires a new registration. To improve the speed and accuracy of registering image and world reference frames in image-guided surgery, a novel automatic registration algorithm was developed and investigated. The surgical navigation system consists of either Polaris (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, ON) or MicronTracker (Claron Technology Inc., Toronto, ON) tracking camera(s), custom software (Cogito running on a PC), and a prototype CBCT imaging system based on a mobile isocentric C-arm (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Experiments were conducted to test the accuracy of automatic registration methods for both the MicronTracker and Polaris tracking cameras. Results indicate the automated registration performs as well as the manual registration procedure using either the Claron or Polaris camera. The average root-mean-squared (rms) observed target registration error (TRE) for the manual procedure was 2.58 +/− 0.42 mm and 1.76 +/− 0.49 mm for the Polaris and MicronTracker, respectively. The mean observed TRE for the automatic algorithm was 2.11 +/− 0.13 and 2.03 +/− 0.3 mm for the Polaris and MicronTracker, respectively. Implementation and optimization of the automatic registration technique in Carm CBCT guidance of surgical procedures is underway.